What LLMs can an RTX 4070 12GB run?
An RTX 4070 12GB runs 20 of the 69 open models tracked here at Q4_K_M with 8K context; the largest is Gemma 4 12B (12.0B parameters, 8.57 GB). It reads memory at 504 GB/s. Each fit leaves at least 0.5 GB free on the RTX 4070 12GB (why a card does not give a model all its memory).
Not sure your PC has an RTX 4070 12GB? Detect your GPU in the browser.
Can I run it on an RTX 4070 12GB with 32K context?
- Gemma 4 26B-A4B: --n-cpu-moe 12
- Gemma 4 31B: No, 4 cards
- Qwen3.8 27B: No, 2 cards
- gpt-oss-20b: --n-cpu-moe 2
- Llama 3.1 8B: Yes, up to Q5_K_M
- gpt-oss-120b: --n-cpu-moe 31
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: --n-cpu-moe 22
- Qwen3.6 27B: No, 2 cards
- Gemma 4 12B: Yes, up to Q5_K_M
- GLM-4.7 Flash: --n-cpu-moe 24
- Qwen3.8 Flash Next: --n-cpu-moe 45
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B: --n-cpu-moe 30
- Qwen3-Coder-Next: --n-cpu-moe 39
- Llama 3.1 70B: No, 8 cards
Models that fit on one RTX 4070 12GB
The most precise weights that still fit with 8K tokens of context and one request, the memory that takes, the longest context at that precision and the writing speed. Bigger models come first.
| Model | Best precision | Memory | Longest context | Tokens/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 12B 12.0B | GGUF Q6_K | 11.2 GB | 25K | 26–36 |
| ZDTaichu 5.0 9B 9.8B | GGUF Q8_0 | 11.4 GB | 9K | 25–35 |
| Ornith 1.5 9B 9.7B | GGUF Q8_0 | 11.3 GB | 14K | 25–35 |
| Qwen3.5 9B 9.7B | GGUF Q8_0 | 11.3 GB | 14K | 25–35 |
| LensVLM 9B 9.4B | GGUF Q8_0 | 11.0 GB | 21K | 26–36 |
| Ornith 1.0 9B 9.4B | GGUF Q8_0 | 11.0 GB | 21K | 26–36 |
| MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B 9.4B | GGUF Q8_0 | 11.0 GB | 21K | 26–36 |
| Bespoke Nimble 9B 9.0B | GGUF Q8_0 | 10.5 GB | 8K (full) | 27–38 |
| Granite 4.2 8B 8.8B | GGUF Q8_0 | 11.4 GB | 8K | 25–35 |
| LFM2.5 8B-A1B 8.5B, 1.5B active | GGUF Q8_0 | 9.82 GB | 128,000 (full) | 79–138 |
| Qwen3 8B 8.2B | GGUF Q8_0 | 10.7 GB | 13K | 27–37 |
| Llama 3.1 8B 8.0B | GGUF Q8_0 | 10.3 GB | 16K | 28–39 |
| Gemma 4 E4B 8.0B | GGUF Q8_0 | 9.38 GB | 128K (full) | 31–43 |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny 7.9B-A1.3B 7.9B, 1.3B active | GGUF Q8_0 | 9.15 GB | 128K (full) | 91–161 |
| LightOnOCR-3 4B 4.5B | FP16 / BF16 | 10.1 GB | 49K | 28–40 |
| Spark-X2.5 4B 4.1B | FP16 / BF16 | 9.35 GB | 63K | 31–43 |
| Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 4.0B | FP16 / BF16 | 8.78 GB | 166K | 33–46 |
| Granite 4.2 3B 3.7B | FP16 / BF16 | 8.69 GB | 40K | 33–46 |
| MiniCPM5 2B 2.5B | FP16 / BF16 | 6.02 GB | 128K (full) | 48–68 |
| Limite 1B Violetto 1.0B | FP16 / BF16 | 2.79 GB | 128K (full) | 104–156 |
Too big for one RTX 4070 12GB at 8K context
How many RTX 4070 12GB cards these need at Q4_K_M (gpt-oss-20b and gpt-oss-120b at MXFP4) with 8K context and 0.5 GB to spare, in one tensor-parallel group; some need more than 8.
- gpt-oss-20b: 2 cards
- Gemma 4 26B-A4B: 2 cards
- Hemmingway-1 27B: 2 cards
- ThinkingCap Qwen3.8 27B: 2 cards
- Qwen3.6 27B: 2 cards
- Qwen3.8 27B: 2 cards
- Granite 4.2 30B: 2 cards
- Muse Glimmer 30B: 2 cards
- Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B: 2 cards
- Qwen3 30B-A3B: 2 cards
- Xing 4.0 29B-A4B: 2 cards
- GLM-4.7 Flash: 2 cards
- Gemma 4 31B: 2 cards
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B: 2 cards
- LLM-jp-4.1 32B-A3B Thinking: 2 cards
- Ornith 1.0 35B: 2 cards
- Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B: 2 cards
- Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 2 cards
- K2-Horizon MoVA 36B-A4B: 4 cards
- Llama 3.1 70B: 8 cards
- Kolibri-1: 8 cards
- Qwen3-Coder-Next: 8 cards
- AliceAI Foundation 80B-A3B: 8 cards
- gpt-oss-120b: 8 cards
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B-A12B: 8 cards
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B: 8 cards
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 8 cards
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: 8 cards
- Qwen3.8 Flash Next: more than 8 cards
- Step 3.7 Flash 196B-A11B: more than 8 cards
- MiniMax M2.7: more than 8 cards
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: more than 8 cards
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: more than 8 cards
- MiMo V2.6 Flash: more than 8 cards
- IQuest-Q1 320B-A15B: more than 8 cards
- GLM-5.3 Flash: more than 8 cards
- MiniMax M3: more than 8 cards
- Ling 3.1 Flash 560B-A25B: more than 8 cards
- DeepSeek V3 / R1: more than 8 cards
- DeepSeek V3.2: more than 8 cards
- GLM-5.3: more than 8 cards
- GLM-5.2: more than 8 cards
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: more than 8 cards
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: more than 8 cards
- Hy4 Preview 770B-A49B: more than 8 cards
- MiMo V2.6 Pro: more than 8 cards
- DeepSeek V4 Pro: more than 8 cards
- Qwen3.8 2.4T-A95B: more than 8 cards
- Kimi K3: more than 8 cards
Best models for RTX 4070 12GB with room for long context
The biggest models that still fit at Q4_K_M with 32,768 tokens of context (or their whole window, if shorter), the memory left over, the longest context the card takes at that precision and the writing speed with that context in the cache, from 504 GB/s of bandwidth.
| Model | Context | Memory | Left over | Longest context | Tokens/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 12B 12.0B | 32K | 8.98 GB | 3.02 GB | 178K | 32–45 |
| ZDTaichu 5.0 9B 9.8B | 32K | 7.67 GB | 4.33 GB | 128K (full) | 37–53 |
| Ornith 1.5 9B 9.7B | 32K | 7.58 GB | 4.42 GB | 145K | 38–53 |
| Qwen3.5 9B 9.7B | 32K | 7.58 GB | 4.42 GB | 145K | 38–53 |
| LensVLM 9B 9.4B | 32K | 7.43 GB | 4.57 GB | 150K | 39–54 |
llama-server commands for one RTX 4070 12GB
GGUF repos checked 2026-09-29; -c is the longest context with 0.5 GB free on the RTX 4070 12GB. No -ngl: llama.cpp’s -fit, on by default since b7440, places the layers.
Gemma 4 12B, Q4_K_M with 178K tokens: 25–35 tokens/s on the RTX 4070 12GB
llama-server -hf unsloth/gemma-4-12b-it-GGUF:Q4_K_M -c 182272 -np 1 gemma-4-12b-it-Q4_K_M.gguf, 7.1 GB: 11.5 GB used and 525 MB free of the RTX 4070 12GB's 12 GB, 25–35 tokens/s once the 178K cache is full. -np 1: one slot, one sliding window.
Ornith 1.5 9B, Q4_K_M with 143K tokens: 25–35 tokens/s on the RTX 4070 12GB
llama-server -hf bartowski/Ornith-1.5-9B-GGUF:Q4_K_M -c 146432 Ornith-1.5-9B-Q4_K_M.gguf, 5.9 GB: 11.5 GB used and 542 MB free of the RTX 4070 12GB's 12 GB, 25–35 tokens/s once the 143K cache is full.
Qwen3.5 9B, Q4_K_M with 145K tokens: 25–35 tokens/s on the RTX 4070 12GB
llama-server -hf unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF:Q4_K_M -c 148480 Qwen3.5-9B-Q4_K_M.gguf, 5.7 GB: 11.5 GB used and 545 MB free of the RTX 4070 12GB's 12 GB, 25–35 tokens/s once the 145K cache is full.
How fast the RTX 4070 12GB writes as the context fills
Tokens per second at Q4_K_M for the biggest models that fit with 32K tokens, with 8K and 32K tokens in the cache and at the longest context the card holds, and at Q8_0 with 8K where that fits. Each token reads the active weights and the whole cache once, so the speed follows the 504 GB/s of bandwidth and falls as the cache grows. The ceiling is that bandwidth divided by the bytes read per token, which no runtime reaches; the reply time is for 1,000 new tokens with 32K (or the longest context) in the cache, prompt processing aside. With the same memory, RTX 3060 12GB, 360 GB/s, writes 28% slower on average; Arc B580 12GB, 456 GB/s, writes 9% slower on average; RTX 5070 12GB, 672 GB/s, writes 31% faster on average.
| Model | 8K | 32K | Longest | At the longest | Q8_0 at 8K | Bandwidth ceiling at 8K | 1,000-token reply at 32K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 12B | 33–47 | 32–45 | 178K | 25–35 | Does not fit | 64 | 22–31 s |
| ZDTaichu 5.0 9B | 42–59 | 37–53 | 128K | 26–36 | 25–35 | 81 | 19–27 s |
| Ornith 1.5 9B | 42–60 | 38–53 | 145K | 25–35 | 25–35 | 83 | 19–26 s |
| Qwen3.5 9B | 42–60 | 38–53 | 145K | 25–35 | 25–35 | 83 | 19–26 s |
| LensVLM 9B | 43–61 | 39–54 | 150K | 25–35 | 26–36 | 85 | 18–26 s |
| Ornith 1.0 9B | 43–61 | 39–54 | 150K | 25–35 | 26–36 | 85 | 18–26 s |
| MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | 43–61 | 39–54 | 150K | 25–35 | 26–36 | 85 | 18–26 s |
| Bespoke Nimble 9B | 45–64 | — | 8K | 45–64 | 27–38 | 89 | 16–22 s |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 39–55 | 25–35 | 32K | 25–35 | 25–35 | 76 | 29–40 s |
| LFM2.5 8B-A1B | 122–222 | 98–175 | 128,000 | 56–97 | 79–138 | 500 | 6–10 s |
RTX 4070 12GB against the other 12 GB cards
The same models fit on every card with 12 GB, so speed is what separates them. By bandwidth the RTX 4070 12GB ranks 2 of 4 at 504 GB/s. Over the 12 biggest models that fit at Q4_K_M with 8K context, the RTX 3060 12GB (360 GB/s) writes 28% slower, the Arc B580 12GB (456 GB/s) writes 9% slower and the RTX 5070 12GB (672 GB/s) writes 31% faster than the RTX 4070 12GB. Each cell below is the other card's tokens per second minus this one's, midpoints of the estimated ranges.
| Model | RTX 4070 12GB tokens/s | RTX 3060 12GB | Arc B580 12GB | RTX 5070 12GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 12B | 33–47 | −11 | −3.7 | +13 |
| ZDTaichu 5.0 9B | 42–59 | −14 | −4.6 | +16 |
| Ornith 1.5 9B | 42–60 | −14 | −4.7 | +16 |
| Qwen3.5 9B | 42–60 | −14 | −4.7 | +16 |
| LensVLM 9B | 43–61 | −15 | −4.8 | +16 |
| Ornith 1.0 9B | 43–61 | −15 | −4.8 | +16 |
| MiMo V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B | 43–61 | −15 | −4.8 | +16 |
| Bespoke Nimble 9B | 45–64 | −15 | −5.0 | +17 |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 39–55 | −13 | −4.3 | +15 |
| LFM2.5 8B-A1B | 122–222 | −44 | −14 | +47 |
| Qwen3 8B | 42–60 | −14 | −4.6 | +16 |
| Llama 3.1 8B | 44–62 | −15 | −4.8 | +17 |
What more cards or MoE offload unlock
One, two and four RTX 4070 12GB cards in one tensor-parallel group (vLLM or SGLang), with the models each step adds at Q4_K_M and 8K context and their tokens per second on that group.
| Setup | Memory | Bandwidth | Models at Q4_K_M | Adds (tokens/s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 4070 12GB | 12 GB | 504 GB/s | 20 | This page |
| 2× RTX 4070 12GB | 24 GB | 1,008 GB/s | 38 | gpt-oss-20b 83–155, Gemma 4 26B-A4B 76–142, Hemmingway-1 27B 29–42, ThinkingCap Qwen3.8 27B 29–41, Qwen3.6 27B 29–41, Qwen3.8 27B 29–41, Granite 4.2 30B 25–36, Muse Glimmer 30B 27–39, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B 78–146, Qwen3 30B-A3B 78–146, Xing 4.0 29B-A4B 78–146, GLM-4.7 Flash 91–173, Gemma 4 31B 24–35, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 94–179, LLM-jp-4.1 32B-A3B Thinking 77–144, Ornith 1.0 35B 99–191, Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B 99–191, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B 99–191 |
| 4× RTX 4070 12GB | 48 GB | 2,016 GB/s | 39 | K2-Horizon MoVA 36B-A4B 98–189 |
Every mixture-of-experts GGUF file the --n-cpu-moe planner has measured, on one RTX 4070 12GB with 32K tokens of
context (or the model's whole window): the smallest --n-cpu-moe that fits the card (0 means the whole file fits),
the memory on the card and in system RAM, and tokens per second from 504 GB/s of card
bandwidth with DDR5-5600, 2 channels (89.6 GB/s) or DDR4-3200, 2 channels (51.2 GB/s).
11 of these models do not fit whole and need offload.
| Model | GGUF | --n-cpu-moe | On the card | In system RAM | Tokens/s, DDR5 | Tokens/s, DDR4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gpt-oss-20b | MXFP4 | 2 | 11.7 GB | 1.36 GB | 37–63 | 33–56 |
| Gemma 4 26B-A4B | UD-Q4_K_M | 12 | 11.6 GB | 6.05 GB | 27–46 | 21–36 |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B | Q4_K_M | 27 | 11.9 GB | 9.33 GB | 18–31 | 14–24 |
| Qwen3 30B-A3B | Q8_0 | 37 | 11.8 GB | 22.4 GB | 11–19 | 8–13 |
| GLM-4.7 Flash | UD-Q4_K_XL | 23 | 11.7 GB | 7.24 GB | 23–39 | 18–30 |
| GLM-4.7 Flash | Q4_K_M | 24 | 11.8 GB | 7.93 GB | 22–38 | 17–28 |
| Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B | Q4_K_M | 30 | 11.9 GB | 12.2 GB | 26–44 | 18–31 |
| Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | UD-IQ4_XS | 17 | 11.7 GB | 6.41 GB | 35–60 | 29–50 |
| Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B | Q4_K_M | 22 | 11.6 GB | 10.2 GB | 34–58 | 26–44 |
| Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | UD-Q4_K_M | 22 | 11.8 GB | 10.5 GB | 30–51 | 23–39 |
| Qwen3.6 35B-A3B | Q8_0 | 30 | 11.6 GB | 24.4 GB | 19–33 | 14–23 |
| Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B | Q8_0 | 31 | 11.6 GB | 25.2 GB | 19–32 | 13–22 |
| Qwen3-Coder-Next | IQ4_XS | 37 | 11.8 GB | 29.6 GB | 25–42 | 17–29 |
| Qwen3-Coder-Next | Q4_K_M | 39 | 11.7 GB | 35.3 GB | 22–37 | 15–25 |
| Qwen3-Coder-Next | UD-Q4_K_XL | 40 | 11.4 GB | 36.6 GB | 19–33 | 14–23 |
| gpt-oss-120b | MXFP4 | 31 | 11.6 GB | 49.6 GB | 12–20 | 8–13 |
| Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Q4_K_M | 45 | 11.1 GB | 61.9 GB | 8–14 | 6–9 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next | UD-Q2_K_XL | 41 | 11.3 GB | 37.1 GB | 17–28 | 12–21 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next | UD-IQ3_XXS | 42 | 11.1 GB | 40.1 GB | 15–26 | 11–19 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next | GSQ-RCO IQ3_S | 43 | 11.2 GB | 41.6 GB | 15–25 | 11–18 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next | UD-Q3_K_XL | 44 | 11.0 GB | 47.7 GB | 13–22 | 10–16 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next | UD-IQ4_XS | 44 | 11.3 GB | 50.8 GB | 13–22 | 9–16 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next | UD-Q4_K_XL | 45 | 11.1 GB | 67.5 GB | 11–18 | 8–13 |
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next | UD-Q5_K_XL | 45 | 12.0 GB | 86.5 GB | 9–16 | 6–11 |
In system RAM counts the offloaded experts plus the input embedding (token_embd), which llama.cpp keeps in RAM in any case.
How these numbers are worked out
Memory is the weights at each precision plus the KV cache for 8,192 tokens in FP16 and runtime overhead (0.5 GB plus 10%), computed from each model's files on Hugging Face with the LLM VRAM Calculator. Speed is estimated from memory bandwidth and the parameters read per token with the LLM Speed Calculator. Both tools take any other model from Hugging Face.
Nearby GPUs and setups
How many of the tracked models each one holds at Q4_K_M with 8K context, against 20 here.
| Setup | How it relates | Memory | Bandwidth | Models at Q4_K_M |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 3060 12GB | Same memory | 12 GB | 360 GB/s | 20 (same) |
| Arc B580 12GB | Same memory | 12 GB | 456 GB/s | 20 (same) |
| RTX 5070 12GB | Same memory | 12 GB | 672 GB/s | 20 (same) |
| RTX 4060 8GB | Next size down | 8 GB | 272 GB/s | 19 (−1) |
| RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | Next size up | 16 GB | 288 GB/s | 21 (+1) |
Model numbers read from Hugging Face on .